The 1982 horror classic Poltergeist is renowned for its chilling tale and groundbreaking special effects. However, lurking beneath its frights lies a disturbing truth that has unsettled audiences for decades. The revelation that real skeletons were used in the infamous pool scene blurs the line between reality and fiction, sparking enduring rumors of a curse and igniting moral debates about filmmaking ethics.
In this article, we aim to provide a detailed examination of the controversial choice to use real skeletons in Poltergeist. We’ll also offer insight into its impact on filmmaking ethics and its lasting legacy in popular culture.
A Brief Overview of the Poltergeist
Released in 1982, Poltergeist is a horror classic directed by Tobe Hooper and produced by Steven Spielberg.
The film follows the Freeling family, whose seemingly idyllic suburban home becomes the site of terrifying supernatural events. When their young daughter, Carol Anne, is mysteriously abducted by malevolent spirits, the family must confront the dark forces at play.
Known for its groundbreaking special effects and spine-chilling storyline, Poltergeist has left an indelible mark on the horror genre, captivating audiences with its blend of suspense, horror, and emotional depth.
The Famous Pool Scene
Diane Freeling (played by JoBeth Williams) is terrified when she finds herself surrounded by skeletons in her family’s pool. This scene is both iconic and scary. It becomes even more shocking when you learn these skeletons were real, not props. Williams wasn’t told during filming that they were real skeletons, which raises questions about the ethics of filmmaking.
Why Real Skeletons?
The filmmakers used real skeletons to make the movie more realistic and unsettling. They wanted the audience to feel uneasy when seeing the bones. Real skeletons were also cheaper and easier to get than making fake ones.
The real skeletons made the supernatural scenes more believable and scary. The filmmakers thought this would create a stronger reaction from the audience. Using real bones was a deliberate choice to make the movie more impactful.
In the early 1980s, using real skeletons in films was more common than you might think. Filmmakers often opted for real bones to save money and make scenes feel more genuine. Back then, attitudes toward what’s ethical in filmmaking were different from today. They’ve changed a lot since then, as people now have stricter rules about what’s acceptable.
Impact of Using Real Skeletons on Realism
Using real skeletons made the film feel more real, blurring the line between movie horror and real life. This added to the creepy atmosphere and fueled the Poltergeist curse legend, which claims the film was cursed and the cast and crew faced bad luck afterward. The use of real human remains has had a lasting effect on the horror genre, making filmmakers reconsider their ethical choices.
When Poltergeist was released, the revelation that real skeletons were used shocked viewers. Some felt disturbed, questioning the ethics of using human bones in a horror film. Critics and viewers alike were intrigued by the controversy, which added an extra layer of fear and fascination to the movie. Even today, discussions about the use of real skeletons in Poltergeist continue to spark debate among fans and film experts.
Filmmakers’ Defense and Criticism
Some involved in Poltergeist defended the use of real skeletons as necessary for authenticity in horror. They argued that it enhanced the film’s eerie atmosphere and made supernatural scenes more believable.
However, critics condemned the decision, citing ethical concerns and questioning whether the shock value justified using real human remains. Interviews with filmmakers reveal mixed feelings, with some expressing regret over the controversy while others defend the artistic choice despite its unsettling impact.
The Cast’s Tragic Fates After Poltergeist
The cast of the 1982 horror film Poltergeist faced tragic events, some of which have fueled the persistent rumors of a “Poltergeist curse”:
Dominique Dunne was murdered by her ex-boyfriend
Dominique Dunne, who played the eldest daughter Dana Freeling in the first Poltergeist film, was murdered by her ex-boyfriend John Sweeney in 1982, just months after the film’s release. Sweeney strangled Dunne to death in her driveway after she refused to reconcile with him. He was convicted of manslaughter and served less than 4 years in prison.
Heather O’Rourke’ died at the age of 12
Heather O’Rourke, the young actress who played Carol Anne Freeling, died in 1988 at the age of 12. She had been misdiagnosed with Crohn’s disease and was undergoing treatment when she suddenly fell ill and died during emergency surgery to correct a bowel obstruction. Her death was later attributed to a congenital intestinal abnormality.
Julian Beck got seriously ill and died before the movie’s release
Julian Beck, who played the villainous Reverend Henry Kane in Poltergeist II, was diagnosed with stomach cancer in 1983 during the film’s production. He died in 1985, before the movie’s release, at the age of 60.
Will Sampson from kidney failure
Will Sampson, who portrayed the Native American shaman Taylor in Poltergeist II, died in 1987 at age 53 from kidney failure following a heart and lung transplant. Sampson had suffered from the chronic degenerative condition scleroderma.
Debunking the “Poltergeist Curse” Myth
Persistent rumors suggest a “Poltergeist curse” haunted the cast and crew, fueled by tragic events after the film’s release. However, many argue these incidents were coincidental rather than supernatural. Skeptics point out that tragedies can happen randomly, and linking them to a curse may be sensationalized.
The deaths of cast members like Dominique Dunne and Heather O’Rourke were indeed tragic, but they occurred under circumstances unrelated to the film. While eerie, these events are often attributed to unfortunate coincidences rather than any supernatural curse.
Exploring these tragedies helps separate fact from fiction, offering a balanced perspective on the myth surrounding Poltergeist and its impact on popular culture.
Legal and Ethical Implications
Using real human remains in filmmaking raises serious legal and ethical concerns. In many countries, including the United States, there are strict regulations regarding the handling and use of human remains, even for artistic purposes.
Filmmakers must navigate laws protecting human dignity and cultural sensitivities. Since Poltergeist, guidelines have become stricter, emphasizing respect for human remains and requiring proper documentation and consent for their use in films.
This controversy prompted industry discussions about ethical boundaries in filmmaking and the responsibility of directors and producers to uphold moral standards.
The Legacy of Poltergeist
Poltergeist remains a significant film in the horror genre, regardless of the ongoing debate. Its influence on popular culture and its lasting popularity cannot be overstated. The movie’s eerie atmosphere, compelling plot, and outstanding performances continue to captivate audiences even today.
The controversy surrounding Poltergeist’s use of real skeletons has left a lasting mark on both the horror genre and filmmaking ethics. It sparked widespread discussions about the boundaries of ethical filmmaking practices and the treatment of human remains in entertainment. The film’s unsettling choice has influenced how subsequent horror films are scrutinized for their use of realistic effects and the ethical implications thereof.
Furthermore, Poltergeist’s legacy extends beyond its technical achievements. It has become a case study in film schools and industry discussions on the responsibilities of filmmakers towards their audiences and subjects. The ongoing debate has prompted guidelines and regulations in various countries to ensure the respectful treatment of human remains in artistic contexts.
In popular culture, Poltergeist’s use of real skeletons has become a notorious example, often referenced in discussions about the ethics of horror films and the lengths filmmakers will go to create fear and suspense. The controversy continues to shape how audiences perceive the film and its impact on the broader entertainment industry.
FAQs
Is “Poltergeist” based on a true story?
No, “Poltergeist” is a fictional film created by Steven Spielberg, Michael Grais, and Mark Victor.
Where was “Poltergeist” filmed?
“Poltergeist” was filmed primarily in Simi Valley, California, USA, and at MGM Studios in Culver City for interior scenes.
How scary is the Poltergeist?
The original “Poltergeist” (1982) is considered quite scary, featuring intense supernatural horror elements.
What was the inspiration behind the film Poltergeist?
The film’s inspiration came from Steven Spielberg’s interest in paranormal phenomena and his script about a haunted house.
Did anything supernatural happen during the filming of Poltergeist?
There were rumors and reports of strange occurrences on set, including unexplained malfunctions with props and equipment. However, these incidents have been debated and attributed to coincidences rather than supernatural events.
Are there any sequels or remakes of the original Poltergeist movie?
Yes, there have been sequels and a remake of “Poltergeist.” The sequels include “Poltergeist II: The Other Side” (1986) and “Poltergeist III” (1988). A remake titled “Poltergeist” was released in 2015, updating the story with modern filmmaking techniques.
Final Thoughts
Poltergeist is a landmark in horror, praised for its groundbreaking effects and chilling story. Yet, its use of real skeletons has sparked lasting ethical debates in filmmaking, challenging the line between art and ethics.
While its technical feats are impressive, Poltergeist raises ethical questions that remain relevant. Examining its history and choices offers insights into evolving filmmaking ethics. This prompts us to balance creativity with respect for human dignity and cultural sensitivity.
Understanding these complexities enriches our view of films like Poltergeist and encourages responsible storytelling. Engaging with its legacy contributes to ongoing discussions about ethics and representation in cinema.
